COVID-19: A catalyst for change in the banking industry

COVID-19 has posed huge and sudden challenges to societies and businesses, disrupting old ways of living and working. One of the most visible manifestations of this in the corporate sphere has been the need for organisations to rapidly transition all or most of their workforce to a remote working model. For financial institutions, key priorities have been to ensure that service and support has been maintained for customers in difficult times and that emergency loans and payment holidays are in place for those who need it. But another priority has been to maintain payment operations. After all, an effective payments system is the lifeblood of the financial system itself.

Physical operations pose challenges The fact is that while electronic payments happen systemically through various automated payment platforms, banks still rely on physical groups of people to run payment operations. This includes the processing of physical instruments like cheques and cash and running highly secure electronic transfer operations. Across both electronic and physical payments, teams of people are also needed to deal with exception processing and to ensure compliance with critical regulatory requirements such as anti-money laundering and fraud checks or the investigation of payments that may be to or from sanctioned entities or jurisdictions.

The good news is that to date, a great majority of personal and business customers will have noticed no difference to payment processing speed and efficiency due to COVID-19. Faster electronic payments have continued unaffected, contactless and mobile payment services have continued to work, and salaries have been credited through payroll processing as normal.

However, the reality is that behind the scenes, the disruptions created by COVID-19 have spawned some significant issues for payment operations to deal with. Cheque processing is a case in point. While cheques have all but died out in many regions of the world, in some jurisdictions such as East Africa, they are still widely used. Processing them promptly and minimising the risk of fraudsters trying to intercept or redirect payments is therefore a matter of great importance. But, despite all the automation that has been introduced to the origination, printing and distribution of cheques, there inevitably remains a significant manual component accompanied with a higher probability of misuse and fraud. Teams of people must work in relatively close collaboration to process them. This has had to continue with appropriate social distancing and introduction of hygiene controls.

Electronic transfers have been another challenging area. These are key to the flow of liquidity in the market, with trillions in regional currencies being transferred daily. The controls in place to process these are necessarily very rigid, taking place in a highly controlled physical environment. Bank responses have varied here, with some being able to move their entire electronic transfer operations to a virtual model, while others have simply not been able to.

Many banks have therefore continued to physically staff both cheque and electronic transfer operations, but on a reduced basis with perhaps a quarter of the normal workforce onsite at any one time, and with new policies and procedures introduced to balance operational effectiveness with safety requirements. Most have opted for a split team approach, alternating the groups of people that come in.

Remote working requires workarounds Organisations have also struggled to adapt to the need to deal with payment exceptions and regulatory controls, remotely due to increased cycle times and inefficiencies across operations and customer support. With staff now working apart and accessing systems through remote desktops or Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), the time-consuming manual activities and virtual handoffs required (i.e., emails between team members and workflow approvals) have led to elongated service level agreement delivery times and have challenged traditional governance, control and data protection mechanisms. The monitoring and tracking of payments against fraud and other financial crimes has also become significantly more difficult and time-consuming.

"Overall, given the unprecedented scope and scale of the knock-on effects of COVID-19, banks’ payment operations have stood up well. But at the same time, COVID-19 has revealed some clear fault lines that need to be addressed especially around cyber security and resilience. It has created an almost unique opportunity to invest in new processes, technology and organisational structures to support more resilient and flexible payment workforces and systems in the future."

New approaches needed for the future It has become clear that banks need long-term solutions that move aspects of their payment operations onto a stronger and more resilient footing so that they are able to withstand the shocks and emergencies of the future. This may mean new approaches to business continuity planning that cover larger, more frequent and globally simultaneous events. With payment operations frequently running across multiple, ageing legacy systems, it is also likely to mean investing in new technology fit for today’s more digital demands as well as re-evaluating the location of servers and data amid the potential for more frequent disruptive events. It is also likely to lead to the greater automation of operations, together with enhanced digital processes to enable staff to function more effectively in a redistributed workforce model.

We can also expect to see a near term rise in the use of managed services. This had already been growing before COVID-19, both to support customer service functions and, in some cases, to run parts of payment operations. Since the outbreak began, this has increased further and is proving a useful fall-back to support enquiries coming in.

Overall, given the unprecedented scope and scale of the knock-on effects of COVID-19, banks’ payment operations have stood up well. But at the same time, COVID-19 has revealed some clear fault lines that need to be addressed especially around cyber security and resilience. It has created an almost unique opportunity to invest in new processes, technology and organisational structures to support more resilient and flexible payment workforces and systems in the future. In short, COVID-19 could prove a significant catalyst for the acceleration of the trends we have already seen towards the digitisation of banking operations.

Related articles

COVID-19: The uninvited guest at the (financial services) table

Restructuring loan facilities has had far reaching effects for banks, as indicated by their interim results in the last quarter of 2020 so far. Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) have increased significantly which has forced most banks to increase their loan provisions in order to cushion against possible defaults. What steps can banks do to mitigate the risk of the provisions being disallowed? PwC's Simon Githinji & Paul Ndirangu discuss

Harnessing Tanzania’s Fintech potential

It is now very difficult to imagine a world without the internet or mobile devices. Despite the increased activity in the fintech sector in Tanzania and the positive multiplier effect in the economy, there is significant potential for further growth. PwC's Uchenna Onuoha writes

Dealing in uncertain times

From an economic perspective, many of the countries in the region were already bracing themselves for slower growth before the pandemic due to various factors. COVID-19 has had a direct impact on deal flow worldwide. Although the official numbers are not yet out, we have also seen much less deal activity in the last twelve months here, closer to home. PwC's Isaac Otolo discusses this developments and more

Adam Sengooba

Associate Director - Risk Assurance Services at PwC Uganda E: adam.sengooba@pwc.com T: +256 312354520 / +256 312354400

Share with your networks

Read the next article: Common pitfalls in ICT Audits